Choose tasty beer…

Choose an off licence. Choose a brewery. Choose a glass. Choose a beer. Choose a fecking big beer. Choose cans, bottles, kegs, and casks. Choose Real Ale, choose Craft, choose Real Craft and life membership. Choose fined, choose unfined. Choose a public house. Choose a working mens club. Choose a New York loft style drinkery. Choose bar snacks and matching beverage. Choose a three piece suite by a plasma screen or a wobbly chair with worn fabric by the fire. Choose homebrewing and wondering who the feck you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on your couch watching mind-numbing spirit-crushing game shows, syphoning junk to your mouth from two cans mounted in a ‘beer’ hat. Choose  a train beer to take away with you at the end of it all, investing your last pounds on an American import, nothing more than the evening deserves, share it with others or drink it yourself. Choose your future. Choose cooking lager . . . But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose cooking lager: I chose something else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you’ve got taste buds?

The Durham Brewery White Stout

I don’t really go in for reviewing beer myself any more, I gave it a go and decided that I got more from reading other people’s thoughts.  But now and then something fun comes along, usually through Twitter, and when The Durham Brewery announced a hashtag (#whitestout) beer tasting I thought I’d get involved.  Having already commented on the White Stout concept I’ll just cut to the chase.  More details on the event here.

Billed as a Pale Stout, it was unsurprising that a pale golden beer emerged from the shadows of the bottle.  I didn’t have to waste valuable time agonising over the concept as I had already read what Sean (the brewer) had intended when making what some might call an oxymoronic beer.  In my mind it stays clear of bold claims and it is the chatter surrounding it that has been cleverly harnessed to make the most of its assets.

The bottle opens with a pop and a quick sniff reveals a strange aroma of straw and what I could only describe as the Jelly Belly Bean toasted marshmallow flavour (yes I know a flavour is not a smell).  It pours with crystal clarity and is a lively little so and so.  A billowing head forms and then settles, but didn’t go anywhere until I drained the last mouthful. The aromas in the glass were subdued, and as I read over and again on Twitter, the beer definitely changes with temperature.  I started from chilled.  The flavours were still pronounced, with biscuit malt and grapefruit/lemon bitterness and only later realised that they were subdued by the cold.  Over the next 30 minutes as it warmed a little, the aroma released more of the fruity hops and as one person described it as “Haribo-esque” character.  I’d agree with this, but would also say that it had a more grown up Belgian candy sugar quality to it.  The malts were coming through as musty and or damp, but I kept coming back to the toasted marshmallow jelly bean flavour.  The last third of the glass really started to show the beers true colours (no pun intended).  The alcohol was heavy and refusing to let anything else stand up to be counted.  I broke out the mature cheddar and can report that it saved the beer at this point in its transformation.

I must say that I enjoyed the beer cold and would buy it should I see it in the pubs, but I’d definitely want some cheese to go with it if I was having more than a refreshing quick-half.  Thanks to the brewery manager Elly (@durhambreweryel) and Sean (@dbrewersean) for the beers, and to those who helped coordinate, for an enjoyable and light-hearted interlude to my evening.  Keep up the good work!

Much ado about hopping

I brewed another beer on Friday night, it’s the beer I will enter in the Revolutions Brewing Co. competition. After reading an interesting post by Zak Avery, it got me thinking about brewing in general.  Having made two mistakes in my last two brews, it’s dawning on me that while I am undoubtedly brewing beer, I have some way to go before I will be comfortable calling myself a brewer, but there really is no other term? (Glorified Brew Monkey perhaps?).  Stick the word ‘home’ before it and the disclaimer is there for all to see.  Much like a green L plate.  I’m legal to brew, but don’t get too close as you might get burnt.  I’m not too hard on myself though, and to coin a phrase from a friends blog on parenting, these early days of homebrewing are merely “mistake-based learning“.

Zak makes the point that there is a marked difference between those who design a recipe and brew the beer, to those who also understand the intricacies of which ingredients marry together, how to control the variables in your process and what makes your brewing equipment tick.  I found this revelation smacking me about the face when my brother-in-law joined me for my last two brewnights.  He witnessed me brewing beer and he now knows which order the brewing vessels are intended to be used and has tasted the resulting beer.  However, and credit to Ben, he asked questions which  I struggled to answer and the experience made me realise that I should really make an effort to find the answers.   I think the same applies for a novice in the kitchen.  When cooking or baking I can happily follow a recipe and set of instructions, providing that they are accurate and well written.  Translating the words into something edible is complex, especially if there is no image of what it is you are supposed to create.  You will always get something on your plate at the end, but is it a good reflection of what you set out to achieve?

One should double-check one’s measurements for accuracy before cutting a piece of wood; otherwise it may be necessary to cut again, wasting time and material

The Revolutions Brewing Co. competition is straightforward.  Brew a 4.5% beer of your choice using European hops.  I brewed a 4.5% Porter using Galena and First Gold hops.  It took a few weeks to click, but when it did I put my face in my hands and made a sound that would confuse Lassie into thinking I was stuck down a well.  Read the instructions and read them again… much like a joiner should measure twice, cut once.  Galena hops are American – I rest my case your honour.  After venting my frustration, my thought process was fast and clumsy, but I concluded that I could not lie, I must brew another beer if I was to be a part of the competition.

Don’t wing it on the day.

Attempt number 2:  Having reacted as quickly as I could, I ordered some more malt (thanks to @BGRTRob) and brewed a 4.5% Pale Ale on Friday gone.  I used the hops from my freezer and a combination I know works well, Challenger and Bobek (Styrian Goldings).  Having decided to start taking things a little more seriously, I also downloaded some software to help me start to document (catalogue) my brews and also to assist me in calculating temperatures and losses based on my choice of ingredients.  I have been doing this, but based loosely on things I’ve read in forums.  Strike temperature and hop utilisation are areas I am trying my damndest to appreciate.  Long story short, the software was great, much the same kind of thing I had been using, but now all in one place and with the added bonus of printable brewday sheets (and a record to refer to should I need it).  But here’s the thing, I half-read my instructions yet again (Measure twice, cut once).  Despite the truth being written down and there in front of me, my strike temp was 6C too hot (I had in mind 78C from a previous brew – whereas this one onlu called for 72C), I mashed for 90 minutes and boiled for 90 minutes.  The recipe sheet was based on 60 minute mash and 60 minute boil.  This affects the extraction from the malts and from the hops.  Not only did I boil for 30 minutes too long, I also decided to alter the hop additions.  Having read briefly around the subject of hop utilisation, I decided that as the hops were quite old and probably way past their best, that I would add what I had available to me for the bittering (roughly double what the recipe called for).  I don’t want to get too hung up on hop utilisation and know that I can’t measure it properly anyway, but I do know it’s possible to brew an unbalanced beer, for example a mouth-puckeringly bitter 4.5% beer.  Some will disagree, but as a general rule I don’t think that thinnish beer can handle hop heavyness.

Despite these hiccups, my quest to gleen mistake-based-brewing-knowledge continues undeterred.

Relax Don’t Worry, Have a Home Brew - Charlie Papazian

AG#7 Broadford Progress IPA

I’ve brewed my entry for the Northern Craft Brewers IPA Day event at Saltaire Brewery, March 31st 2012.  If you are a homebrewer and want to join in, then this is a joint event with the Midlands Craft Brewers and I’m sure both groups would welcome some new faces.  I want this beer to have plenty of time in the bottle so decided to get a brew on.

With it being an English IPA competition, there are a few requirements;

OG

FG

IBUs

SRM

ABV

1.050 – 1.070 1.010 – 1.018 40 – 80 8 – 14 5 – 7.4%

Oh and most importantly,  English hops only.

So here was my plan, brew something pale, clear and with a decent head on it.  Having said that, I think the judges will probably have a taste too, so I decided to throw a few hops in, 100g of Progress hops to be precise.  It may sound a lot (or not enough?), but I’ve tried to match the IBU’s (International Bitterness Units scale) with the abv (alc/vol).  I’ve been told this is a reasonable idea when trying to balance the bitterness.  Also, over the sixty minute boil, I went for 50% (weight) for bittering and 50% for aroma.   I’ve not used Progress hops before and couldn’t find any examples of it being used as a single hop, but I do believe it will be a good all-rounder and think it’s worth a punt.  As for the malts, the guidelines do not limit the choice, but should be “consistent”with the style.

A hoppy, moderately strong pale ale that features characteristics consistent with the use of English malt, hops and yeast

This will be a good test for me as an inexperienced homebrewer.  Brewing to style and nowhere to hide when judges and peers are going to be involved. Using Progress hops is really quite apt I thought, see how far I have made it thus far.  I should also mention that I invited fellow homebrewer and brother-in-law Ben (@boodrums) along.   He recently brewed his first beer, a partial mash Pale Ale and is already building his mash tun in preparation for his first full mash brewday.

Malts:
Golden Promise Pale Malt – 86.7%
Munich Malt – 5.2%
Amber Malt – 3.1%
Crystal Malt 30L – 2.7%
Wheat Malt – 2.3%

Hops:
Progress 50g – 7.9% @60mins
Progress 10g – 7.9% @30mins
Progress 10g – 7.9% @20mins
Progress 10g – 7.9% @10mins
Progress 15g – 7.9% @0mins (steep 20 mins)

Final Volume: 19 Litres
Original Gravity: 1.061
Final Gravity: 1.015
Alcohol Content: 6.1% ABV
Bitterness: 58.3 IBU
Colour: 9.6 SRM
Yeast: Nottingham Danstar
Mash: 60mins @ 67c
Boil: 60mins

It was a fairly late start on Friday evening, with the HLT switched on at 7pm, but with Ben firing questions at me and the bottles of beer flowing, (breaking my usual rule of no beer until the boil!), I really didn’t care that my rendezvous with the finishing line was located somewhere in the small hours of Saturday morning.

I had an issue with losing too much heat during the mash for my last brew so, compensated three-fold: raised the strike temp a degree to 79C, wrapped the mashtun with a blanket and used more malt.  The idea being that less head-space = improved insulation.  Mashing in at 68C, a bit hot I know but I lost 5 degrees last time and ruined the extraction.

I also decided to experiment with both a 60 minute mash and a 60 minute boil (I usually use the standard 90 mins for each).  After 60 minutes the mash temp was 67C (lost 1C).

The 1st runnings from the mash tun were clear after recirculating 6L.  I was pleased with the colour and my copper manifold performed well again…Woo!

First addition of 50g Progress hops to the copper at 60mins.

Still not built my chiller, so lots of waiting around to get a good cold break (FV in the sink/cold water).

I achieved a final volume of 18L at 1.071.  Used a calculator and liquored back 2L to achieve a gravity reading closer to my target of 1.062.  A 7% IPA was tempting.  I then opted to leave the FV cooling and covered with cling film – awaiting yeast in the morning.  I don’t like doing this for fear of a wild yeast invasion, but couldn’t stay up any longer (it was 2:00 am).

I took another reading in the morning but didn’t take a photo. It was spot on 1.061 at 22C.  Made a quick starter for the Nottingham Danstar yeast using 100ml cooled boiled water and 100ml of the wort.  Pitched the yeast 28th 08:30am.

An enjoyable brewday, but I’ve also got some figuring out to do.  Something is not right at Broadford.  Somewhere between, calculating losses, efficiency and being clueless is resulting in targets being missed.  More practice required.  Suggestions welcome.

Updated: Bottled this beer FG 1.015 08/02/2012

Homebrewing First Steps – Brewing Equipment

When it comes to homebrewing there is plenty to think about before you’re able to enjoy the fruits of your labour.  I know a few people who are looking to brew this year and thought I’d write up my thoughts on the first steps I took.  I hope to write three more posts in fairly quick succession but this one will focus on the kit you will need to brew an All Grain or Full Mash beer, based on starting with a set-up capable of 23L / 5 Imperial Gallon brew-length.

You may find some of this information useful if you can’t decide whether you want to give Partial Mash brewing a go first.  In my opinion, if you have the space, the money and the time to invest in 8 hour brew sessions (approx), then plan to do Full Mash first.  If you don’t have one of the above then maybe Partial Mash is the way forward.  Equally, find a local homebrewer who can show you the basics and give you a better appreciation for what’s involved than any book or blog post can ever offer, but don’t just try to copy what they do, because if you understand why you are doing something you have a better chance of enjoying homebrewing.

Beer kits can be fun too, but ask yourself why you want to brew before you go down this route.  If you want cheap, not particularly brilliant beer that will serve its purpose, then brew a few kits, some of them are actually pretty good.  If you want to create or recreate a beer you know you love to drink, as well as having a hobby that will help you learn about your favourite pastime (drinking beer) and possibly meet some great people, then give kits a miss.  These are just my opinions of course….actually everything you read here is just my opinion, and another homebrewer will give you slightly different advice.  Having said that, read plenty and be prepared to take the plunge and you’ll be brewing in your own way soon enough.

In no particular order, although you will end up with a mess on the floor without brewing equipment, the list below are the main components for brewing a beer.  Blend them with a little common sense and knowing when to ask questions and you’ll be grinning from ear to ear at the beer you’ve created.

  1. Brewing equipment
  2. Ingredients
  3. Mad keen sanitation skills
  4. Your first brew day

There is a wealth of information available in homebrewing books and even more on the internet, but as I learn how to brew myself, this is my attempt to document what I found to be the most time consuming part of the process – ‘the getting started’.   I talked too much about it and managed to over-complicate something that should be straightforward.  My experience is that even the beginners books hide the need-to-know information among the complexities, i.e. the stuff you will get around to learning as you go.   I hope this info is useful for anyone starting out.

Brewing Equipment

You may have already read my post on building my brewing kit.  I’ve started by building my mash tun and will move on to my wort chiller and a Hot Liquor Tank (HLT) during 2012.  I was given a boiler (copper).  The links are to The Homebrew Shop, there are of course other places to buy kit from, but this is just as an example and I will be building my own where possible to save money and to gain a better understanding of the brewing process.

Hot Liqour Tank (HLT) – This is just a large kettle, but with a temperature control.  Ideally (for 23L / 5 Imperial Gallon brews) the HLT will have a 30-40L capacity to save messing around refilling it with tap water (liquor).

Mash Tun – An insulated vessel that is used to mash the fermentables (malted barley and other adjuncts).  It’s insulating properties are key to enable the mash to remain at a constant temperature, typically 66C for 60-90mins but this can vary greatly depending on what you are trying to achieve (read: advanced homebrewing).  Basically, this process is to convert the starch in the grain into sugars (i.e. extracting sugar from the malt).  It’s also essential that the mash tun has a filter or manifold, and a tap to allow you to easily run the wort into the copper (once the liquor is full of lovely sugars it’s referred to as wort)

Copper – A vessel used to boil the wort.  Without going into details, details that I hardly understand, the point of boiling the wort is to sterilise the wort, enable the proteins in the wort to stick together, remove unwanted volatiles (we don’t need to know what these are at this stage) and to concentrate the wort through evaporation.  There are many more reasons for the boil, but lets keep this light.  Typically, the wort is boiled for 45-90 mins, but as with the mash, this will depend on what you are trying to achieve.  It’s probably worth mentioning that a copper, for most amateur homebrewers, is going to be plastic, or even stainless steel if you are lucky.

Fermentation Vessel (FV) – In most cases the FV is likely to be a 5 Gallon plastic bucket.  The information for best practice during fermentation does vary from source to source, but most set-ups call for the minimum of a 5 Gallon bucket with a lid.  If you have the option, then it may be worth buying a bucket which is fitted with an airlock.  Without boring you senseless, and again with my limited knowledge, the importance of the lid and the airlock are as follows.  The lid is to protect your fermenting wort from contamination.  If you have a suitable environment to do so, it is possible to ferment without a lid, but if there is any chance of insects or inquisitive children or pets, then seal the bucket with a lid.  This will also stop any wild yeasts from contaminating your brew.  Wild yeasts are used in some cases, but that is for the more advanced brewer e.g. brewing a Lambic beer.

If you are using an FV with a lid but without an airlock, then it is important to open the lid every day to allow the build up of carbon dioxide to disperse.  An air-lock will do this job for you.  This will prevent off flavours in your beer and also from the mess of an exploding FV (a little dramatic, but you get my point).

Aside from a long-handled plastic spoon and a sanitising product (which I’ll write about below), then you have the basics to to start brewing.  The next two items are not essential, but will make your life easier and also increase your chances of achieving a drinkable beer every time you brew.

Thermometer – I bought a cheap thermometer for £3.50 from Wilkinson’s.  It’s very useful to be able to take temperature measurements throughout the brewing process.  You can get a long without knowing the temperature of the mash before and after 90 minutes, but you will find it difficult to diagnose a problem with your mash tun if you don’t know how efficient it is at retaining heat? Also, knowing the temperature of your boiled wort before pitching the yeast.  More on yeast in the next post on ingredients, but it is a living organism and is temperature sensitive.  The majority of top fermenting yeasts work within a range of 18-24C.  It’s not only disappointing when your fermentation stops (or never gets started), but it is also expensive to pitch more yeast.  You may also want to take temperature readings during the fermentation.  Don’t overdo this and always santise the object as per the manufacturers instructions.  Consider that every time you place objects such as a thermometer, hydrometer or trial jar into your beer you increase the chance of your beer becoming contaminated and/or infected.  This rule applies to contact with the wort post boil.  Knowing when your fermentation is complete can be tricky if you are judging it by sight.  The krausen (or frothy head that forms on top of the beer in the FV) will have subsided and sunk to the bottom of the FV or will be held in suspension, and there will be few visible bubbles rising to the surface.  If you don’t fancy this guess-work then get a thermometer and a hydrometer (see below) and use the readings from both to get an accurate indication that your fermentation is still progressing and that it has finished at the correct gravity (see below).

Hydrometer – A hydrometer is used to measure the Specific Gravity (SG) (or relative density) of your wort and eventually your beer (I believe that wort is referred to as beer once you have pitched the yeast).   Taking a gravity reading before and during fermentation allows you to understand its progress.  The hydrometer will sink deeper into low density liquids such as alcohol.  The SG of water at zero degrees C is 0.999, which is important to know when testing or calibrating your new hydrometer.  You can adjust your readings based on this knowledge or decide to buy a better quality instrument.  Your Original Gravity (OG – before fermentation has started) and the Final Gravity (FG – after fermentation is complete) will be determined by the recipe you are brewing.  A prepackaged all grain beer will state it’s OG/FG and target alcohol content by abv.  If you are creating your own recipes then it is a good idea to use a recipe calculator within one of the brewing forums, or within a piece of brewing software.  Based on the fermentables you are using, it will calculate the OG and FG for you.  It’s also important to remember that the gravity readings are affected by the temperature of the wort/beer (e.g. the SG of water at 4C is 1.000).  Using both a hydrometer and a thermometer will enable you to reference the readings using a conversion chart (buy a basic homebrewing book) to give you an accurate reading.  A couple of good reasons for taking gravity reading are: to prevent you from bottling beer that has no alcohol content (i.e a stuck or failed fermentation) and also from bottling or kegging a beer that hasn’t finished fermenting fully and running the risk, cost and inconvenience of exploding bottles/kegs.  This happens when the beer continues to ferment in the bottle/keg, creates more CO2 than the bottle/keg can take….and BOOM!

Quite literally on that bomb-shell, I think that’s enough for now.  As you can see from just listing the kit, it is almost impossible to describe what you need and how you should use it without getting into the basics of ‘how to brew’.  My next post will give an overview of brewing ingredients, followed by posts on sanitation and finally a brew day.

Thanks for reading.

When Black is White

Colour is a means of communication, we instantaneously recognise a meaning or a message where colour is present.  It’s a non-verbal cue that taps into our learned associations and we use it on a daily basis to help us stay safe, fit in to our surroundings and determine what we will eat or drink.  We can have a lot of fun with colour and it is possible to manipulate a recognisable object and make most of us look twice.  The novelty value of engineering a red banana or blue carrot is likely to be short lived, but try convincing a child that green rice pudding isn’t brilliant!

The colour of beer is determined by the malt and is measured using one of several scales, the  Standard Reference Method (SRM – “Degrees Lovibond” or “°L” scale) being one.   Colour is important (to some) when characterising or categorising beer, there is of course the opinion that colour isn’t everything, but lets not go there.  We know where we stand when we order a lager or a stout, we know instinctively know what the first sip will offer.  Well we could rely on visual priming until now anyway.  If you keep up-to-date with the latest beer news, then it won’t have escaped you that there have been some recent developments which are causing a stir, some debate and in one case an affirmation of tradition.

Richard Fletcher – Journal Live -  got a great quote from Durham Brewery owner Steve Gibbs in his article back in December 2011.  Steve isn’t about reproducing a beer, he prefers to take original styles and “Durhamise” them.  Which is exactly what they have done in brewing a 7.2% abv White Stout (launched Nov 2011) .  They describe this as a “modern pale stout“.  That’s right, it’s not just in the name, this is a pale, full bodied – and taking the word ‘stout‘ literally – it’s a strong beer.  I tried it on keg at Mr Foleys and it didn’t disappoint.  I bought a pint just to make sure.  From my memory it was a golden syrup sweetness, fruity, big mouth feel and oh so bitter.

While the word “stout” has come to mean a dark beer, the original meaning was strong and true. Before the porter brewers commandeered the word to mean a stout, or strong, porter it referred to any strong beer – Durham Brewery

Interestingly, and most likely a facet of being Durhamised, is that they use American Columbus hops, not a ‘traditional’ hop choice for representing a 200 year old beer style, but where would the fun be in being traditional?  If a brewer decides that Columbus is the hop that will produce the bitterness, flavour and aroma they desire, then that is the best hop choice.  While we’re talking brewer creative licence, I happen to think Durham have got it spot on.  Their White Stout is a heavily hopped (72 IBUs bitterness), strong beer and crucially it has the body to carry it off.  Just to add, heavily hopped doesn’t always equal ‘bitter’, they could be used as late copper hops for subtle bitterness and maximum aroma, which this White Stout also has in abundance (the aroma that is).  The only blog reviews and resulting comments I’ve read are few, and with mixed reactions.  I think this is more to do with the limited availability at present, but expect to see more opinions as the bottles hit the shops.  Also, I think that a change from the ‘norm’ is a challenge for some people, with their initial reaction almost predetermined: “but it’s not black” and reject the idea as ‘no added value’, to which I disagree.

There are other examples of this alchemy and more readily available in the form of the much debated Black and Red India Pale Ale’s, but the only other brewery to get involved with pale stout’s is BrewDog with their Abstrakt AB:08 an 11.8% abv “deconstructed imperial blonde stout” no less, which I’ve read is amber/gold in colour (a 6500 bottle release December 2011).  Pleasing to see a brewery steal the march on BrewDog for once.

So I understand from eavesdropping on @DurhamBreweryEl ‘s Tweets  and a brief email conversation that the second brew of their White Stout is bottled and nearing distribution.  Always worth waiting for your beer to taste just right before releasing it into the wild.  The beer plains can be a harsh environment.  So having casked the first brew and bottled the second, the third brew will be on cask and keg and hitting pubs next week, but if you really can’t wait that long then get yourself over to the brewery’s bar on Saturday (21st Jan 2012) and fill your boots, so to speak, although that is one way of taking beer home with you.

Is all fair in love and wort?

Image by Jamie Dodge

Sam Calagione’s response to the thread on Beer Advocate last week got me thinking.  I read it here, but there are loads of sites that have posted it.  In short, Sam was responding to a discussion on Beer Advocate which was focusing on negativity and pointing the finger at Dogfish Head as one of a number of “over-rated” craft brewers.  The author of the posts opinions and associated comments provoked a response from Sam who is upset at these ‘beer geeks’ for “knocking down breweries that dare to grow“.  It’s an interesting area for discussion as we are all too familiar with the same notion in society in general.  Celebrity is short-lived and soon the vindictiveness and hard times begin.  We build them up and then knock them down.  It’s the human way.  I’m not saying we are all the same, but there are swathes of our society who can’t help themselves.

Image from 'When Saturday Comes'

Getting back to breweries though, I think this rings true.  A new micro brewery opens, they are only brewing 1,2,5,10 barrels per brew and everyone is excited.  Their beer is talked about and sought after and we can’t get enough of it.  Some of our favourite breweries will then grow, they will do this because of demand and will have the difficult decisions to make as to how far they should go.  Think of a football club whose meteoric rise through the football league sees unprecedented demand for season tickets (I’m not saying Wolverhampton Wanderers and the images [right] are an example of this – but their banners illustrate a point I’m trying to make).

Image from 'When Saturday Comes'

The chairman and board of directors will sanction a development program or the build of a new stadium to meet this demand.  Money will be borrowed to finance the progression and in doing so, price increases will be felt by the fans.  There is always a small chance that this club will find its place in the league and maintain its debts and satisfy its shareholders by keeping bums on seats – everyone is happy.  More often than not, the club will experience a bad run of results, sometimes a whole seasons worth, which can affect revenues such as sponsorships, prize money, ticket sales, the club could even be be relegated, affecting money from TV rights etc.  Finances are restructured, players are sold and opinions and perceived values held by the fans will be tested as season ticket prices remain high: “I’m not paying to watch this dross“… “they’re not the same team as last season” (the fickle fan).  Equally, a football club may become unrecognisable on and off the pitch, alienating the fans that were there times were tougher “this club isn’t for me anymore“.  A vicious circle and the familiar tale of becoming a victim of your own success.  Transfer this scenario to any number of breweries that have burst on to the ‘craft’ brewing scene and I think there is something to be wary of.

Without naming names, the exciting young breweries of 2010 – 2011 will be looking to grow.  Not only to meet demand, but to do the best they can, to earn a decent living and in some cases just to survive.  All of the breweries I have in mind will probably do their very best to stick to their vision, keep the quality of their beer high and continue to innovate and keep things fresh and interesting for themselves and for the punters.  But something these breweries cannot account for, and which is largely out of their control,  is that as they grow and new young and exciting breweries enter the market, the opinion of ‘Beer Geek A’ will start to shift, new opinions will be formed which may just result in ‘Beer Geek A’ spending less of their beer money on last years brewery and more on the new starlet.  Sadly, it will also be the case that ‘Beer Geek B’ may take exception to marketing strategies (or the hype), or the quality of the beer which may not up to the standards they are used to.   Faults will be found even where they do not exist and very public opinions voiced: “They’re not the brewery they were last year“…”I’m not paying for this dross“.

So when does this happen?  it seems to be subtle.  From Sam Calagione’s account of things, and he knows his business better than we do, Dogfish Head enjoyed the support and adulation in the early years, they progressed to satisfy themselves and us, but then they became “over-rated” in the eyes of some.  Do these critics genuinely believe this? or is it more a case that they once felt some connection with a small craft brewery, almost like they knew them personally.  Then, when the brewery grew, did these particular customers feel ‘put out’, upset at a lost connection they once felt they had, and instead of acknowledging Dogfish Head’s successes, they react with petulance and stick the boot in.

So getting back to my silly blog title, ‘Is all fair in love and wort?’.  Is it generally accepted that the rules of fair play change when it comes to business, or being a paying customer? Friendly feedback becomes a ‘critique’.  Support for a small brewery can tail off, fault-finding or straight out, sometimes unfounded, criticisms start as the brewery grows or becomes ‘successful’.  I’m not sure my football analogy is a perfect match [no pun intended], but in any case it looks to me that it is easier to be the underdog, while recognising that at some point you may need a bigger kennel, which might just piss the neighbours off.

Respect Beer.

Nomadic Blogging and Brewing

Image: Kristina B

I think most beer bloggers would accept that their writing or photography is cyclical, to varying degrees.  Themes and ideas are revisited but are not necessarily repetitions.  Within a new blog post or article it is common practice to reference similar material, like-minded or conflicting, to give context and as a way of documenting and archiving developments in a particular topic of interest.  I’m finding that when I consider writing a blog post, I can choose a current talking point, or I can review a topic that either I or someone else has previously commented on.  It can of course be both of these things.  One other option is to write collaboratively or to guest blog with another blogger, something I tried in 2011 and will be looking to expand on this year.

As a homebrewer and someone who harbours serious aspirations to be involved in the brewing industry, I mostly revisit ideas involving brewing, kind of an appraisal of my brewing activity, a ‘where am I now’ and ‘where do I see myself in five years time’ type exercise.  I feel it’s important to do this every so often regardless of the subject, to renew focus or to change direction.

As it is the beginning of a new year and having read that yesterday is the day of the year that people are most likely to look online for a new job, I found myself thinking things over.  I know how easy it is to switch jobs to freshen things up a little, I’m lucky enough to be able to do this If I choose to.  Having said that, I don’t look at this in the same way as I did five years ago.  I no longer take my employment for granted and see little point in starting a new job that is essentially the same as the last.  So if I had the opportunity or the resources to take brewing a step further I’d take it.  I’ve looked at my options when it comes to brewing, not in as much detail as would be needed if I was about to do it tomorrow, but know that there are three options available to me: 1). Find a job with an existing brewery, 2). start a brewery, or 3). brew professionally using someone elses brewery.  There is of course a fourth option to carry on homebrewing, enjoy it for what it is and stick to the day job.

Cuckoo brewing is basically a practice whereby a brewer pays to use spare capacity at someone elses brewery.  A shining example of this approach being Mikkel Borg Bjergsø and his marvelous Mikkeller beers, I also regard him, along with a more local example in Revolutions Brewing Co, as my main inspiration in looking to progress from kitchen brewing.  Will Hawkes recently wrote about Bjergsø as The Gypsy Brewer and Intelligent Life magazine – the lifestyle publication from the Economist – have written a piece in their Jan/Feb 2012 edition: “Move over, Carlsberg: the gypsy brewers are coming“.  I need to explore this business model and brew plenty more beer at home before proclaiming this is where I’m heading, but it’s certainly an interesting approach.   I’ll revisit this again on my blog in six months time and try and keep my goal in sight.

A Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

Cap in hand

My friend has a conundrum.  No not me, a friend.

This friend likes to drink beer and sometimes likes to chat through the medium of social media while drinking beer.  He usually plays it safe and knows where his boundaries are, keeps conversations light and tries not to offend anyone.  Well, this friend recently enjoyed a couple of beers and responded to some information he read on a blog about Brewery A (not BrewDog) and was irrationally perturbed at Brewery A’s decision to make public their explanation for an under par online shop performance during parts of 2011.  An explanation which, in my opinion, was in bad form.

Instead of scrolling past this virtual soapbox with a deserving yet fleeting roll of the eyes, my friend’s rubber neck, rubber necked and before he knew it he got involved (in a small way).  He may have got his bumper bent out of shape over nothing.

Making 140 character statements can sometimes serve a purpose and cut through the detail. 140 characters can be powerful stuff.  A misplaced application of said 140 characters can also leap-frog the part of the brain that controls reasoning.  Add to this a phrase banded about freely; “…as a matter of principle“.

My friend would like to know if, as a matter of principle, he should stick to his 140 character appraisal of a situation, a situation he still feels was uncalled for but cannot fully appreciate as he doesn’t have all the facts? or does he decide to swallow his Yorkshire pride, hold his tweeting thumb aloft and acknowledge he was wrong to get involved?

My friend tells me that he vowed never to drink Brewery A’s beer again unless they publicly apologise to Fulfillment Partner B.  He feels that on this occasion, his stock pile of anti-freeze will not be needed to defrost hell.

While my friend still thinks that parts of Brewery A’s explanation stinks, should he really punish himself over something that does not concern him?

Mash Tun Build – Homebrew

Funny looking mash tun?

I’ve set myself a goal for the coming months, a DIY mission that many homebrewers embark on.  Building some or all of your own kit is something that is likely to save you some money when starting out, but if it doesn’t then hopefully there is knowledge to be banked along the way.  Understanding my kit and being able to maintain it is something I’m interested in, but I understand it’s not for everyone.  It’s also a lot of fun, honest!

To date I have inherited a shop-bought 5 gallon boiler and a few plastic buckets.  Having experienced first-hand what it’s like to use one boiler as a three-in-one; HLT (Hot Liquor Tank), Copper and Mash Tun I was keen not to experience it again.  With some instructions from the folks on The Homebrew Forum I managed to build my own mash tun.  It’s been done and documented many times by other brewers, but here’s my attempt:

I built this back in May 2011 and have used it for three brews.  The pictures aren’t great and I’ve not taken a shot of each stage, but I was concentrating on building the thing and the camera work came second.

There are a few ways to build a mash tun, but I decided to convert a cheap 24L coolbox and a copper manifold.

Total cost including materials:£25

Tools I Used: A drill & circular drill bit, copper pipe cutter, hacksaw (or some sort of angle grinder if you can get hold of one), I also borrowed a pipe bending gizmo which I needed to accommodate my ‘design’, pliers, files and wire wool.

Stage 1: Assembling the Tap

Measured up for the tap and cut a hole through the outer/inner casing of the coolbox. Threaded the tank connector through from the inside-out and using a small section of copper pipe attached the ball valve tap (all 15mm fittings).  I added a copper elbow joint to the end of the tap to form a spout.

Stage 2: Constructing the Manifold

First I measured up inside the coolbox to see what size manifold will fit comfortably and cut the copper pipe to fit. I had to bend the pipe connecting the tap and the manifold to allow the manifold to sit flat against the floor of the coolbox.

Fitted the copper pipes, T-joints and elbows together, secured the manifold in a vice and went about cutting as many slots into it as possible, cutting approx half way through the pipe. I used a hacksaw mainly, but did use a Dremel drill with a cutting tool on it (although it just overheated too often and because of the steamed up safety glasses I managed to cut some bad angles!).

Stage 3: Fitting the Constructed Manifold

Simply connect the pipe from the manifold into the internal tank connector (inside the coolbox, with the slots facing down).  Testing found no leaks and the manifold drained the water effectively with a small dead space of 0.5L  (i.e. the amount of water left in the tun with the tap fully open).  Once happy with your mash tun and manifold, then some people choose to solder a few of the joints to hold the manifold together, but it is possible to lightly nip each of the joints together, which allows easy cleaning.

Hope this is of use to someone thinking of doing the same.

Next up:  I’ll be attempting build an Immersion Wort Chiller and a 30L plastic boiler (can’t really call it a copper can I!)